The America’s Next Top Model Documentary Isn’t Just a Retrospective. It’s a Warning


“We all now understand the protections that women need, so I say to Keenyah, boo boo, I am so sorry. None of us knew. Network executives didn’t know, and I did the best that I could at that time.” This is also the implied reason that producers never intervened to stop Shandi Sullivan’s apparent sexual assault. That it was simply a different time.

Banks almost always cites the era. This was an era where Fear Factor and Survivor were popular, and that’s why they pushed challenges to extremes. This was the era of “heroin chic.” This was an era before Me Too. “Looking at that show through the lens of today, it’s like, ‘Ooh why did you do that?’” Banks says at the end of the series. She promises to grow from the criticism.

Likewise, reactions to the docuseries online largely agree that ANTM was uniquely a product of the time, and that society knows better now.

The problem is that, as a society, maybe we don’t actually know better. Maybe, in fact, the hard-won gains millennial women fought for are on the brink of slipping away before our very eyes. While it’s easy to claim the moral high ground, to (rightfully) condemn the show as one of the culture’s most egregious examples of misogyny gussied up as “empowerment,” it’s harder to recognize that we’re in the midst of a backslide. And harder yet to find a way to do anything about it.

Theoretically, the body positivity movement would prevent a recurrence of the fat-shaming in America’s Next Top Model. Body positive and body neutral influencers thrived on social media over the past decade, and plus-size models like Ashley Graham have graced the cover of Sports Illustrated. But now, in the age of Ozempic, plus-size influencers are suddenly finding themselves with less and less influence—or even backlash. One former influencer, Gabriella Lascano, has gone so far as to retract her body-positivity stance in the New York Times, claiming that the movement became “an excuse to ignore how big I was getting,” rather than a rebuke of rail thinness as the norm.

The return of Y2K fashion goes hand-in-hand with the Ozempic era, bringing with it a return of extreme thinness on runway models and romanticized eating disorders. Instead of finding “pro-ana” content on chatrooms and America’s Next Top Model, women and girls today are finding it TikTok or X. According to the National Eating Disorders Association, the rate of eating disorders among college students surged 13 percentage points between 2013 and 2020. Slowly, it seems, the glamorization of ultra-thinness has crept back into the zeitgeist.

Similarly, it seems impossible to believe that what Sullivan and Hill endured would be allowed in a post-Me Too world, but so many things are allowed in a post-Me Too world. How many men named in the Epstein files have actually been held accountable? How much casual misogyny do we let slide on a daily basis from our most powerful leaders? While a lot of people on social media have come out in support of Sullivan and criticized the show and its producers, there are others who are just as confidently asserting that she is no victim at all. While some concrete gains were made by the movement, the cultural backlash that followed feels almost like a counterweight at times.

If we really are committed to living in a better society than the one we remember from ANTM, we have to recognize these injustices as they happen—not just with the privilege of hindsight. You can’t treat a disease without diagnosing it first, and you can’t progress as a society without calling out its evils. You know how they say those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it? Well, if we don’t do something now, we’re heading right back to the early 2000s.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top